Ooops, have you read Dick Morris' latest column about Speaker Pelosi's son's new job?
View your credit file based on any of the UK credit reference agencies, or all three at once
LifeLock is the only Identity Theft Prevention Solution backed by a one-million dollar guarantee!Click here to get a 10% discount.
First of all, just because the New York Times "cited" something doesn't make it so. I agree, it looks bad for the company, but let prosecutors get at the whole story before you get your shorts in a bunch.
Secondly, not all companies have 100% ethical employees. That does not mean that the parent company condoned or asked for the unethical behavior. There seem to be some bad apples in every basket. Maybe Info USA fired people who did the things you stated. (We can only pray that it did!)
Thirdly, it IS possible that Info USA did not know that the companies that purchased their lists were going to use them for nefarious purposes.
Fourth, is it possible that Pelosi's son was hired to look into any accusations of wrongdoing? Or that he is there to "fix" the company's image?
You jump to some really wild conclusions in your question, and I admonish you to step back and get all the facts first. But, no matter what the truth may be: Pelosi's son is a separate individual from his mother. There is nothing in the world that says parents and children think and act alike. If the only criminals in the world were born only TO criminals, it sure would be easy to stop crime, wouldn't it????
Ooops, have you read Dick Morris' latest column about Speaker Pelosi's son's new job?For the 100th time....Dick Morris used to work for Clinton and just has an axe to grind against the Dems for Hillary not hiring him...he is about as credible as Rush Limaugh
Ooops, have you read Dick Morris' latest column about Speaker Pelosi's son's new job?3500 dead, Scooter in jail, civil war in Iraq...Hey! Look over there! A Democrat getting a cushy job! War? What war?
More Related Questions and Answers ...
The loan information post by website user , we not guarantee correctness.